On Mon, 2021-03-08 at 15:56 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Matter of taste. Match the prefix for everything else related to
> steppings. No functional changes.

Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.so...@intel.com>
For the renaming patches, 6, 7 and 8 I'm also fine with the current naming up 
to you.


> 
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h |  2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c        | 12 ++++++------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h        |  2 +-
>  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
> index f84569e8e711..1bcae2a8c79b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
> @@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ struct intel_runtime_info {
>  
> 
> 
> 
>       u32 rawclk_freq;
>  
> 
> 
> 
> -     struct i915_rev_steppings step;
> +     struct intel_step_info step;
>  };
>  
> 
> 
> 
>  struct intel_driver_caps {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c
> index 9df2dd264841..914a5de4346e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c
> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
>  
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
>  /* FIXME: what about REVID_E0 */
> -static const struct i915_rev_steppings kbl_revids[] = {
> +static const struct intel_step_info kbl_revids[] = {
>       [0] = { .gt_step = STEP_A0, .display_step = STEP_A0 },
>       [1] = { .gt_step = STEP_B0, .display_step = STEP_B0 },
>       [2] = { .gt_step = STEP_C0, .display_step = STEP_B0 },
> @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ static const struct i915_rev_steppings kbl_revids[] = {
>       [7] = { .gt_step = STEP_G0, .display_step = STEP_C0 },
>  };
>  
> 
> 
> 
> -static const struct i915_rev_steppings tgl_uy_revid_step_tbl[] = {
> +static const struct intel_step_info tgl_uy_revid_step_tbl[] = {
>       [0] = { .gt_step = STEP_A0, .display_step = STEP_A0 },
>       [1] = { .gt_step = STEP_B0, .display_step = STEP_C0 },
>       [2] = { .gt_step = STEP_B1, .display_step = STEP_C0 },
> @@ -34,12 +34,12 @@ static const struct i915_rev_steppings 
> tgl_uy_revid_step_tbl[] = {
>  };
>  
> 
> 
> 
>  /* Same GT stepping between tgl_uy_revids and tgl_revids don't mean the same 
> HW */
> -static const struct i915_rev_steppings tgl_revid_step_tbl[] = {
> +static const struct intel_step_info tgl_revid_step_tbl[] = {
>       [0] = { .gt_step = STEP_A0, .display_step = STEP_B0 },
>       [1] = { .gt_step = STEP_B0, .display_step = STEP_D0 },
>  };
>  
> 
> 
> 
> -static const struct i915_rev_steppings adls_revid_step_tbl[] = {
> +static const struct intel_step_info adls_revid_step_tbl[] = {
>       [0x0] = { .gt_step = STEP_A0, .display_step = STEP_A0 },
>       [0x1] = { .gt_step = STEP_A0, .display_step = STEP_A2 },
>       [0x4] = { .gt_step = STEP_B0, .display_step = STEP_B0 },
> @@ -49,10 +49,10 @@ static const struct i915_rev_steppings 
> adls_revid_step_tbl[] = {
>  
> 
> 
> 
>  void intel_step_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>  {
> -     const struct i915_rev_steppings *revids = NULL;
> +     const struct intel_step_info *revids = NULL;
>       int size = 0;
>       int revid = INTEL_REVID(i915);
> -     struct i915_rev_steppings step = {};
> +     struct intel_step_info step = {};
>  
> 
> 
> 
>       if (IS_ALDERLAKE_S(i915)) {
>               revids = adls_revid_step_tbl;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h
> index 102fd6a26893..958a8bb5d677 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.h
> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
>  
> 
> 
> 
>  struct drm_i915_private;
>  
> 
> 
> 
> -struct i915_rev_steppings {
> +struct intel_step_info {
>       u8 gt_step;
>       u8 display_step;
>  };

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to