If an irq aux error happens, it does not need to wait for PSR "IDLE state"
for re-enabling PSR. And it should not try to re-enable PSR.
The PSR interrupt handler sets irq_aux_error when the PSR error happens.
And it schedules the inter_psr_work(). but the current intel_psr_work() can
be scheduled by another PSR internal routine.
Therefore, we should not re-enable PSR after handing irq_aux_error in
intel_psr_work().
v2: Address Jose's review comment.
- Handling the closing function in the check routine of irq_aux_error.
- Add a detailed commit message for the scenario.
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.so...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong....@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
index cd434285e3b7..aba15846e78e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
@@ -1683,8 +1683,10 @@ static void intel_psr_work(struct work_struct *work)
if (!intel_dp->psr.enabled)
goto unlock;
- if (READ_ONCE(intel_dp->psr.irq_aux_error))
+ if (READ_ONCE(intel_dp->psr.irq_aux_error)) {
intel_psr_handle_irq(intel_dp);
+ goto unlock;
+ }
/*
* We have to make sure PSR is ready for re-enable
--
2.30.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
