While reviewing patches for handling workarounds related to gen9 bc, Imre
from Intel discovered that we're using spt_hpd_irq_setup() on ICP+ PCHs
despite it being almost the same as icp_hpd_irq_setup(). Since we need to
be calling icp_hpd_irq_setup() to ensure that CML-S/TGP platforms function
correctly anyway, let's move platforms using PCH_ICP which aren't handled
by gen11_hpd_irq_setup() over to icp_hpd_irq_setup().
Cc: Tejas Upadhyay <tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadh...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <ly...@redhat.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
index f86b147f588f..7ec61187a315 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
@@ -4320,6 +4320,8 @@ void intel_irq_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup = gen11_hpd_irq_setup;
else if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv))
dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup = bxt_hpd_irq_setup;
+ else if (INTEL_PCH_TYPE(dev_priv) >= PCH_ICP)
+ dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup = icp_hpd_irq_setup;
else if (INTEL_PCH_TYPE(dev_priv) >= PCH_SPT)
dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup = spt_hpd_irq_setup;
else
--
2.29.2
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
