Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2021-02-10 10:55:44) > > On 10/02/2021 10:35, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2021-02-10 09:37:55) > > Ok, that works very well. Hmm. The sort order does seem a little jumpy > > though. May I suggest ac->id = -c->pid; instead of num; > > Done it although I thought 1st pass being sort by pid already, num as id > would follow a stable order. I guess your point was inversion to > preserve order when cycling sort modes?
I thought that makes more sense for 'aggregate-by-pid', that it should either be in ascending/descending pid order for idle. It just felt very jumpy; it may have been tiny amount of %busy, but I suspected it may have been slightly unstable sorting with changing clients. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
