On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:00:53AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 03:43:05PM -0300, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: >> > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@gmail.com> >> >> I'm confused what exactly this tests, since it seems to never fail ... >> automated tests should have some checks for expected results. >> >> Also I'm not sure whether we want such ddx/X tests in igt ... > > Whether or not it makes a good test, it is nice to have a repository of > the little hacks we use for debugging. From little acorns mighty oaks > grow.
Agreed, but then it imo shouldn't be added to the default list of targets of tests to run. We already have a bunch of these scripts added to EXTRA_DIST, I guess adding a new variable SCRIPTS would be good. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
