On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:24:03PM +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> 
> We don't need to store the FBC WM enabled status in each watermark
> level. We anyway have to reduce it down to a single boolean, so just
> delay checking the FBC WM limit until we're computing the final
> value.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>

The pay-off simply being the reduction of one bool in a temporary
struct [x3]?

Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to