Quoting Matthew Auld (2020-11-05 15:40:20) > On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 15:39, Matthew Auld > <matthew.william.a...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 10:11, Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote: > > > > > > More the specialised interation with the physical GEM object from the > > > > Move interaction > > > > > pread/pwrite ioctl handler into the phys backend. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > > Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.a...@intel.com> > > Does this need Fixes btw?
I was thinking so long as we land before dg1 it would be fine. If we did a fake lmem with no aperture, we would have problems already. But there's no user exposure, so no pressing need for cc:stable. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
