With the current code there shouldn't be a distinction - however with an
upcoming change we intend to allocate a vma much earlier, before it's
actually bound anywhere.

To do this we have to check node allocation as well for the _bound()
check.

Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <b...@bwidawsk.net>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index fb3f02f..21331d8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -3179,12 +3179,6 @@ search_free:
        list_move_tail(&obj->global_list, &dev_priv->mm.bound_list);
        list_add_tail(&vma->mm_list, &vm->inactive_list);
 
-       /* Keep GGTT vmas first to make debug easier */
-       if (i915_is_ggtt(vm))
-               list_add(&vma->vma_link, &obj->vma_list);
-       else
-               list_add_tail(&vma->vma_link, &obj->vma_list);
-
        fenceable =
                i915_is_ggtt(vm) &&
                i915_gem_obj_ggtt_size(obj) == fence_size &&
@@ -4059,6 +4053,12 @@ struct i915_vma *i915_gem_vma_create(struct 
drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
        vma->vm = vm;
        vma->obj = obj;
 
+       /* Keep GGTT vmas first to make debug easier */
+       if (i915_is_ggtt(vm))
+               list_add(&vma->vma_link, &obj->vma_list);
+       else
+               list_add_tail(&vma->vma_link, &obj->vma_list);
+
        return vma;
 }
 
@@ -4754,7 +4754,7 @@ bool i915_gem_obj_bound(struct drm_i915_gem_object *o,
        struct i915_vma *vma;
 
        list_for_each_entry(vma, &o->vma_list, vma_link)
-               if (vma->vm == vm)
+               if (vma->vm == vm && drm_mm_node_allocated(&vma->node))
                        return true;
 
        return false;
-- 
1.8.3.4

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to