On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 11:40:28AM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 03:51:11PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 05:33:34PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
>
>Just like with the DDIs tgl+ renamed the AUX CHs to reflect
>the type of the DDI. Let's add the aliasing enum values for
>the type-C AUX CHs.
>
>Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
>---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h |  8 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c      | 53 ++++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
>index a39be3c9e0cf..cba876721ea0 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
>@@ -290,6 +290,14 @@ enum aux_ch {
>    AUX_CH_G,
>    AUX_CH_H,
>    AUX_CH_I,
>+
>+   /* tgl+ */
>+   AUX_CH_USBC1 = AUX_CH_D,
>+   AUX_CH_USBC2,
>+   AUX_CH_USBC3,
>+   AUX_CH_USBC4,
>+   AUX_CH_USBC5,
>+   AUX_CH_USBC6,
> };
>
> #define aux_ch_name(a) ((a) + 'A')
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>index 239016dcd544..a73c354c920e 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>@@ -1792,7 +1792,6 @@ static i915_reg_t skl_aux_ctl_reg(struct intel_dp 
*intel_dp)
>    case AUX_CH_D:
>    case AUX_CH_E:
>    case AUX_CH_F:
>-   case AUX_CH_G:
>            return DP_AUX_CH_CTL(aux_ch);
>    default:
>            MISSING_CASE(aux_ch);
>@@ -1813,7 +1812,52 @@ static i915_reg_t skl_aux_data_reg(struct intel_dp 
*intel_dp, int index)
>    case AUX_CH_D:
>    case AUX_CH_E:
>    case AUX_CH_F:
>-   case AUX_CH_G:
>+           return DP_AUX_CH_DATA(aux_ch, index);
>+   default:
>+           MISSING_CASE(aux_ch);
>+           return DP_AUX_CH_DATA(AUX_CH_A, index);
>+   }
>+}
>+
>+static i915_reg_t tgl_aux_ctl_reg(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>+{
>+   struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
>+   struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
>+   enum aux_ch aux_ch = dig_port->aux_ch;
>+
>+   switch (aux_ch) {
>+   case AUX_CH_A:
>+   case AUX_CH_B:
>+   case AUX_CH_C:
>+   case AUX_CH_USBC1:
>+   case AUX_CH_USBC2:
>+   case AUX_CH_USBC3:
>+   case AUX_CH_USBC4:
>+   case AUX_CH_USBC5:
>+   case AUX_CH_USBC6:
>+           return DP_AUX_CH_CTL(aux_ch);
>+   default:
>+           MISSING_CASE(aux_ch);
>+           return DP_AUX_CH_CTL(AUX_CH_A);
>+   }
>+}
>+
>+static i915_reg_t tgl_aux_data_reg(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, int index)
>+{
>+   struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
>+   struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
>+   enum aux_ch aux_ch = dig_port->aux_ch;
>+
>+   switch (aux_ch) {
>+   case AUX_CH_A:
>+   case AUX_CH_B:
>+   case AUX_CH_C:
>+   case AUX_CH_USBC1:
>+   case AUX_CH_USBC2:
>+   case AUX_CH_USBC3:
>+   case AUX_CH_USBC4:
>+   case AUX_CH_USBC5:
>+   case AUX_CH_USBC6:
>            return DP_AUX_CH_DATA(aux_ch, index);
>    default:
>            MISSING_CASE(aux_ch);
>@@ -1834,7 +1878,10 @@ intel_dp_aux_init(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>    struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
>    struct intel_encoder *encoder = &dig_port->base;
>
>-   if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9) {
>+   if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 12) {
>+           intel_dp->aux_ch_ctl_reg = tgl_aux_ctl_reg;

why is this even a function pointer rather than just the reg? AFAICS it
only depends on dig_port->aux_ch that is initialized in intel_ddi_init()

Just for consistency with .aux_ch_data_reg() I guess. Can't remember
a more specific reason at least.

even that may be overkill since all the users just use index to
do `+ index * 4`

Lucas De Marchi



but could be orthogonal to the change here.


Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demar...@intel.com>

Lucas De Marchi

>+           intel_dp->aux_ch_data_reg = tgl_aux_data_reg;
>+   } else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9) {
>            intel_dp->aux_ch_ctl_reg = skl_aux_ctl_reg;
>            intel_dp->aux_ch_data_reg = skl_aux_data_reg;
>    } else if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev_priv)) {
>--
>2.26.2
>
>_______________________________________________
>Intel-gfx mailing list
>Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to