On 9/30/2020 2:45 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 12:53:21PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 04:59:29PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 09:46:47AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
@@ -296,11 +223,17 @@ static struct ib_umem *__ib_umem_get(struct ib_device
*device,
goto umem_release;
cur_base += ret * PAGE_SIZE;
- npages -= ret;
-
- sg = ib_umem_add_sg_table(sg, page_list, ret,
- dma_get_max_seg_size(device->dma_device),
- &umem->sg_nents);
+ npages -= ret;
+ sg = __sg_alloc_table_from_pages(
+ &umem->sg_head, page_list, ret, 0, ret << PAGE_SHIFT,
+ dma_get_max_seg_size(device->dma_device), sg, npages,
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ umem->sg_nents = umem->sg_head.nents;
+ if (IS_ERR(sg)) {
+ unpin_user_pages_dirty_lock(page_list, ret, 0);
+ ret = PTR_ERR(sg);
+ goto umem_release;
+ }
}
sg_mark_end(sg);
Does it still need the sg_mark_end?
It is preserved here for correctness, the release logic doesn't rely on
this marker, but it is better to leave it.
I mean, my read of __sg_alloc_table_from_pages() is that it already
placed it, the final __alloc_table() does it?
Jason
It marks the last allocated sge, but not the last populated sge (with page).
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
