Am 09.08.20 um 08:17 schrieb Lukas Bulwahn:
With commit 72b6ede73623 ("dma-buf.rst: Document why indefinite fences are
a bad idea"), document generation warns:
Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst:182: \
WARNING: Title underline too short.
Repair length of title underline to remove warning.
Fixes: 72b6ede73623 ("dma-buf.rst: Document why indefinite fences are a bad
idea")
Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulw...@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>
Should I pick it up into drm-misc-next?
---
Daniel, please pick this minor non-urgent fix to your new documentation.
Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst
b/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst
index 100bfd227265..13ea0cc0a3fa 100644
--- a/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst
+++ b/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ DMA Fence uABI/Sync File
:internal:
Indefinite DMA Fences
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
At various times &dma_fence with an indefinite time until dma_fence_wait()
finishes have been proposed. Examples include:
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
