On Fri, 2020-05-29 at 09:51 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 01:03:53PM -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> > It will be programed right before the link training, so no need to do
> > it twice.
> > It will not strictly follow BSpec sequences but most of this sequences
> > are not matching anyways.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.so...@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c | 19 ++++---------------
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> > index aa22465bb56e..c100efc6a2c4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> > @@ -3115,7 +3115,6 @@ static void tgl_ddi_pre_enable_dp(struct
> > intel_atomic_state *state,
> > enum phy phy = intel_port_to_phy(dev_priv, encoder->port);
> > struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = enc_to_dig_port(encoder);
> > bool is_mst = intel_crtc_has_type(crtc_state, INTEL_OUTPUT_DP_MST);
> > - int level = intel_ddi_dp_level(intel_dp);
> > enum transcoder transcoder = crtc_state->cpu_transcoder;
> >
> > intel_dp_set_link_params(intel_dp, crtc_state->port_clock,
> > @@ -3190,9 +3189,10 @@ static void tgl_ddi_pre_enable_dp(struct
> > intel_atomic_state *state,
> > * down this function.
> > */
> >
> > - /* 7.e Configure voltage swing and related IO settings */
> > - tgl_ddi_vswing_sequence(encoder, crtc_state->port_clock, level,
> > - encoder->type);
> > + /*
> > + * 7.e Configure voltage swing and related IO settings
> > + * It will be done in intel_dp_start_link_train(), no need to do twice
> > + */
>
> Hmm. Do we still set it up before turning on the port?
No.
intel_dp_start_link_train()
intel_dp_link_training_clock_recovery()
intel_dp->prepare_link_retrain(intel_dp)/intel_ddi_prepare_link_retrain();/*
Port is enabled here in training mode */
....
intel_dp_reset_link_train()
intel_dp_set_signal_levels() /* Vswing table is set
here */
Guess is safer keep programming it twice then?
>
> >
> > /*
> > * 7.f Combo PHY: Configure PORT_CL_DW10 Static Power Down to power up
> > @@ -3257,7 +3257,6 @@ static void hsw_ddi_pre_enable_dp(struct
> > intel_atomic_state *state,
> > enum phy phy = intel_port_to_phy(dev_priv, port);
> > struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = enc_to_dig_port(encoder);
> > bool is_mst = intel_crtc_has_type(crtc_state, INTEL_OUTPUT_DP_MST);
> > - int level = intel_ddi_dp_level(intel_dp);
> >
> > if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 11)
> > drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm,
> > @@ -3279,16 +3278,6 @@ static void hsw_ddi_pre_enable_dp(struct
> > intel_atomic_state *state,
> >
> > icl_program_mg_dp_mode(dig_port, crtc_state);
> >
> > - if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11)
> > - icl_ddi_vswing_sequence(encoder, crtc_state->port_clock,
> > - level, encoder->type);
> > - else if (IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv))
> > - cnl_ddi_vswing_sequence(encoder, level, encoder->type);
> > - else if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv))
> > - bxt_ddi_vswing_sequence(encoder, level, encoder->type);
> > - else
> > - intel_prepare_dp_ddi_buffers(encoder, crtc_state);
>
> This last one definitely has to stay IIRC. HSW/BDW/SKL buf trans
> stuff works quite bit differently than the BXT+ style more manual
> programming.
>
> > -
> > if (intel_phy_is_combo(dev_priv, phy)) {
> > bool lane_reversal =
> > dig_port->saved_port_bits & DDI_BUF_PORT_REVERSAL;
> > --
> > 2.26.2
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
