On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 11:02:06AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> DRI clients really should be using MOCS to get fine grained streaming
> cache controls. With that note, I *hope* that this patch doesn't improve
> performance overwhelmingly, because if it does - it means there is a
> problem elsewhere.
> 
> In any case, the kernel, and old userspace should get some benefit from
> this, so let's do it. eLLC is always a good default, and really not
> using it is the special case for MOCS.
> 
> References: 
> http://www.intel.com/newsroom/kits/restricted/ha$well!/pdfs/4th_Gen_Intel_Core_PressBriefing_5-29.pdf
>  (page 57)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <b...@bwidawsk.net>

Iris is the marketing name and likely to stick around for a bit (like HD
Graphics), I'd vote to use the codename for this thing here, i.e. crw.
-Daniel

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> index 42262d0..0ff8073 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
>  #define HSW_CACHEABILITY_CONTROL(bits)       ((((bits) & 0x7) << 1) | \
>                                        (((bits) & 0x8) << (11 - 3)))
>  #define HSW_WB_LLC_AGE0                      HSW_CACHEABILITY_CONTROL(0x3)
> +#define HSW_WB_ELLC_LLC_AGE0         HSW_CACHEABILITY_CONTROL(0xb)
>  
>  static gen6_gtt_pte_t gen6_pte_encode(dma_addr_t addr,
>                                     enum i915_cache_level level)
> @@ -109,6 +110,18 @@ static gen6_gtt_pte_t hsw_pte_encode(dma_addr_t addr,
>       return pte;
>  }
>  
> +static gen6_gtt_pte_t iris_pte_encode(dma_addr_t addr,
> +                                   enum i915_cache_level level)
> +{
> +     gen6_gtt_pte_t pte = GEN6_PTE_VALID;
> +     pte |= HSW_PTE_ADDR_ENCODE(addr);
> +
> +     if (level != I915_CACHE_NONE)
> +             pte |= HSW_WB_ELLC_LLC_AGE0;
> +
> +     return pte;
> +}
> +
>  static void gen6_write_pdes(struct i915_hw_ppgtt *ppgtt)
>  {
>       struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = ppgtt->dev->dev_private;
> @@ -860,7 +873,9 @@ int i915_gem_gtt_init(struct drm_device *dev)
>       } else {
>               gtt->gtt_probe = gen6_gmch_probe;
>               gtt->gtt_remove = gen6_gmch_remove;
> -             if (IS_HASWELL(dev))
> +             if (IS_HASWELL(dev) && dev_priv->ellc_size)
> +                     gtt->pte_encode = iris_pte_encode;
> +             else if (IS_HASWELL(dev))
>                       gtt->pte_encode = hsw_pte_encode;
>               else if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev))
>                       gtt->pte_encode = byt_pte_encode;
> -- 
> 1.8.3
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to