On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.di...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Stephen Rothwell <s...@canb.auug.org.au> > wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20130628: >> >> The regulator tree gained a build failure so I used the version from >> next-20130628. >> >> The trivial tree gained a conflict against the fbdev tree. >> >> The arm-soc tree gained a conflict against the net-next tree. >> >> The akpm tree lost a few patches that turned up elsewhere and I removed 2 >> that were causing run time problems. >> > > [ CC drm and drm-intel folks ] > > [ Did not check any relevant MLs ] > > Please, see attached dmesg output.
Clock mismatch, one for Jesse to figure out. Note that this patch is for 3.12, I simply haven't yet gotten around to properly split my patch queue so a few spilled into -next. I'll do that now. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
