Skip useless priority bumping on adding a new dependency by making sure
that we do update the priority if we would have rescheduled the active
cotnext.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
index af51810dc78c..68b06a7ba667 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
@@ -209,6 +209,8 @@ static void kick_submission(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
if (!inflight)
goto unlock;
+ engine->execlists.queue_priority_hint = prio;
+
/*
* If we are already the currently executing context, don't
* bother evaluating if we should preempt ourselves.
@@ -216,7 +218,6 @@ static void kick_submission(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
if (inflight->context == rq->context)
goto unlock;
- engine->execlists.queue_priority_hint = prio;
if (need_preempt(prio, rq_prio(inflight)))
tasklet_hi_schedule(&engine->execlists.tasklet);
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
