From: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janul...@linux.intel.com>

The release method will undo what we did at creation, and so we
shouldn't care if we have pages or not. Fixes a small leak in the
mock_phys selftest.

Signed-off-by: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janul...@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.a...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_phys.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_phys.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_phys.c
index b07bb40edd5a..698e22420dc5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_phys.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_phys.c
@@ -194,10 +194,11 @@ int i915_gem_object_attach_phys(struct 
drm_i915_gem_object *obj, int align)
        /* Perma-pin (until release) the physical set of pages */
        __i915_gem_object_pin_pages(obj);
 
-       if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(pages)) {
+       if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(pages))
                i915_gem_shmem_ops.put_pages(obj, pages);
-               i915_gem_object_release_memory_region(obj);
-       }
+
+       i915_gem_object_release_memory_region(obj);
+
        mutex_unlock(&obj->mm.lock);
        return 0;
 
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to