Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
> If we stop filling the ELSP due to an incompatible virtual engine
> request, check if we should enable the timeslice on behalf of the queue.
>
Leaves me pondering more of the why.
So that on these boundaries also, the last rq gets subdued to
a timeslice and not get a free run?
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> index 5da86a40434c..954bd4797482 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> @@ -1802,6 +1802,20 @@ static void set_timeslice(struct intel_engine_cs
> *engine)
> set_timer_ms(&engine->execlists.timer, active_timeslice(engine));
> }
>
> +static void start_timeslice(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> + struct i915_request *last)
> +{
> + struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists = &engine->execlists;
> +
> + /* As we are returning early, update the hint from the queue */
> + execlists->switch_priority_hint =
> + max(execlists->queue_priority_hint,
> + execlists->switch_priority_hint);
> +
> + if (!execlists->timer.expires && need_timeslice(engine, last))
> + set_timer_ms(&execlists->timer, timeslice(engine));
> +}
> +
> static void record_preemption(struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists)
> {
> (void)I915_SELFTEST_ONLY(execlists->preempt_hang.count++);
> @@ -1965,11 +1979,7 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs
> *engine)
> * Even if ELSP[1] is occupied and not worthy
> * of timeslices, our queue might be.
> */
> - if (!execlists->timer.expires &&
> - need_timeslice(engine, last))
> - set_timer_ms(&execlists->timer,
> - timeslice(engine));
> -
> + start_timeslice(engine, last);
> return;
> }
> }
> @@ -2004,6 +2014,7 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs
> *engine)
>
> if (last && !can_merge_rq(last, rq)) {
> spin_unlock(&ve->base.active.lock);
> + start_timeslice(engine, last);
> return; /* leave this for another */
for another interrupt?
-Mika
> }
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
