On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 12:21:01AM +0000, Souza, Jose wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-02-28 at 22:35 +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > Currently we're comparing the watermarks between the old and new
> > states
> > before we've fully computed the new watermarks. In particular
> > skl_build_pipe_wm() will not account for the amount of ddb space
> > we'll
> > have. That information is only available during skl_compute_ddb()
> > which will proceed to zero out any watermark level exceeding the
> > ddb allocation. If we're short on ddb space this will end up
> > adding the plane to the state due erronously determining that the
> > watermarks have changed. Fix the problem by deferring
> > skl_wm_add_affected_planes() until we have the final watermarks
> > computed.
> >
> > Noticed this when trying enable transition watermarks on glk.
> > We now computed the trans_wm as 28, but we only had 14 blocks
> > of ddb, and thus skl_compute_ddb() ended up disabling the cursor
> > trans_wm every time. Thus we ended up adding the cursor to every
> > commit that didn't actually affect the cursor at all.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > index 39299811b650..a3d76e69caae 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > @@ -5762,16 +5762,24 @@ skl_compute_wm(struct intel_atomic_state
> > *state)
> > ret = skl_build_pipe_wm(new_crtc_state);
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
> > -
> > - ret = skl_wm_add_affected_planes(state, crtc);
> > - if (ret)
> > - return ret;
> > }
> >
> > ret = skl_compute_ddb(state);
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
> >
> > + /*
> > + * skl_compute_ddb() will have adjusted the final watermarks
> > + * based on how much ddb is available. Now we can actually
> > + * check if the final watermarks changed.
> > + */
> > + for_each_oldnew_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc,
> > old_crtc_state,
> > + new_crtc_state, i) {
> > + ret = skl_wm_add_affected_planes(state, crtc);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > + }
>
> skl_compute_ddb() is already calling skl_wm_add_affected_planes() after
> do the ddb allocation for each pipe, so we could remove this chunk,
skl_compute_ddb() calls skl_*ddb*_add_affected_planes(), which is a
different thing.
> with that:
>
> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.so...@intel.com>
>
> > +
> > skl_print_wm_changes(state);
> >
> > return 0;
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
