The intent of the check is made more clear if we use the proper name for
0 here.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
index da3dfd7..173fe8f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
@@ -879,7 +879,7 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
                break;
        case I915_EXEC_BSD:
                ring = &dev_priv->ring[VCS];
-               if (ctx_id != 0) {
+               if (ctx_id != DEFAULT_CONTEXT_ID) {
                        DRM_DEBUG("Ring %s doesn't support contexts\n",
                                  ring->name);
                        return -EPERM;
@@ -887,7 +887,7 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
                break;
        case I915_EXEC_BLT:
                ring = &dev_priv->ring[BCS];
-               if (ctx_id != 0) {
+               if (ctx_id != DEFAULT_CONTEXT_ID) {
                        DRM_DEBUG("Ring %s doesn't support contexts\n",
                                  ring->name);
                        return -EPERM;
@@ -895,7 +895,7 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
                break;
        case I915_EXEC_VEBOX:
                ring = &dev_priv->ring[VECS];
-               if (ctx_id != 0) {
+               if (ctx_id != DEFAULT_CONTEXT_ID) {
                        DRM_DEBUG("Ring %s doesn't support contexts\n",
                                  ring->name);
                        return -EPERM;
-- 
1.8.3.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to