On 04/02/2020 16:19, Chris Wilson wrote:
No engine can be missed when verifying that a rogue user cannot cause a
denial-of-service with nohangcheck.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
---
__for_each_physical_engine, keep the leaks
---
  tests/i915/gem_ctx_exec.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_ctx_exec.c b/tests/i915/gem_ctx_exec.c
index b1ae65774..aeb8d2976 100644
--- a/tests/i915/gem_ctx_exec.c
+++ b/tests/i915/gem_ctx_exec.c
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
#include "igt_dummyload.h"
  #include "igt_sysfs.h"
+#include "sw_sync.h"
IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Test context batch buffer execution."); @@ -203,9 +204,9 @@ static bool __enable_hangcheck(int dir, bool state) static void nohangcheck_hostile(int i915)
  {
-       int64_t timeout = NSEC_PER_SEC / 2;
-       igt_spin_t *spin;
+       const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e;
        igt_hang_t hang;
+       int fence = -1;
        uint32_t ctx;
        int err = 0;
        int dir;
@@ -215,6 +216,8 @@ static void nohangcheck_hostile(int i915)
         * we forcibly terminate that context.
         */
+ i915 = gem_reopen_driver(i915);
+
        dir = igt_sysfs_open_parameters(i915);
        igt_require(dir != -1);
@@ -223,16 +226,35 @@ static void nohangcheck_hostile(int i915) igt_require(__enable_hangcheck(dir, false)); - spin = igt_spin_new(i915, ctx, .flags = IGT_SPIN_NO_PREEMPTION);
+       __for_each_physical_engine(i915, e) {
+               igt_spin_t *spin;
+
+               spin = igt_spin_new(i915, ctx,
+                                   .engine = e->flags,

Ouch, I missed a mismatch between ctx and e->flags here. Thanks to Sreedhar for reporting it.

We either need gem_context_set_all_engines back or to rethink a cleaner strategy.

Regards,

Tvrtko

+                                   .flags = (IGT_SPIN_NO_PREEMPTION |
+                                             IGT_SPIN_FENCE_OUT));
+
+               igt_assert(spin->out_fence != -1);
+               if (fence < 0) {
+                       fence = spin->out_fence;
+                       spin->out_fence = -1;
+               } else {
+                       int new;
+
+                       new = sync_fence_merge(fence, spin->out_fence);
+                       close(fence);
+
+                       fence = new;
+               }
+       }
        gem_context_destroy(i915, ctx);
+       igt_assert(fence != -1);
- if (gem_wait(i915, spin->handle, &timeout)) {
+       if (sync_fence_wait(fence, MSEC_PER_SEC / 2)) {
                igt_debugfs_dump(i915, "i915_engine_info");
                err = -ETIME;
        }
- igt_spin_free(i915, spin);
-
        __enable_hangcheck(dir, true);
        gem_quiescent_gpu(i915);
        igt_disallow_hang(i915, hang);
@@ -240,7 +262,11 @@ static void nohangcheck_hostile(int i915)
        igt_assert_f(err == 0,
                     "Hostile unpreemptable context was not cancelled immediately 
upon closure\n");
+ igt_assert_eq(sync_fence_status(fence), -EIO);
+       close(fence);
+
        close(dir);
+       close(i915);
  }
igt_main

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to