Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
> Use a runtime limit, not a fixed amount of work, so that it doesn't take
> several hundred seconds on the slower machines.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> tests/i915/gem_pipe_control_store_loop.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_pipe_control_store_loop.c
> b/tests/i915/gem_pipe_control_store_loop.c
> index b8a21d780..9330a47c8 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/gem_pipe_control_store_loop.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/gem_pipe_control_store_loop.c
> @@ -62,13 +62,13 @@ uint32_t devid;
>
> /* Like the store dword test, but we create new command buffers each time */
> static void
> -store_pipe_control_loop(bool preuse_buffer)
> +store_pipe_control_loop(bool preuse_buffer, int timeout)
> {
> int i, val = 0;
> uint32_t *buf;
> drm_intel_bo *target_bo;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < SLOW_QUICK(0x10000, 4); i++) {
> + igt_until_timeout(timeout) {
> /* we want to check tlb consistency of the pipe_control target,
> * so get a new buffer every time around */
> target_bo = drm_intel_bo_alloc(bufmgr, "target bo", 4096, 4096);
> @@ -182,10 +182,10 @@ igt_main
> }
>
> igt_subtest("fresh-buffer")
> - store_pipe_control_loop(false);
> + store_pipe_control_loop(false, 2);
>
> igt_subtest("reused-buffer")
> - store_pipe_control_loop(true);
> + store_pipe_control_loop(true, 2);
>
> igt_fixture {
> intel_batchbuffer_free(batch);
> --
> 2.25.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> igt-dev mailing list
> igt-...@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
