If we detect a ring is in a valid wait for another, just let it be.
Eventually it will either begin to progress again, or the entire system
will come grinding to a halt and then hangcheck will fire as soon as the
deadlock is detected.
This error was foretold by Ben in
commit 05407ff889ceebe383aa5907219f86582ef96b72
Author: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu May 30 09:04:29 2013 +0300
drm/i915: detect hang using per ring hangcheck_score
"If ring B is waiting on ring A via semaphore, and ring A is making
progress, albeit slowly - the hangcheck will fire. The check will
determine that A is moving, however ring B will appear hung because
the ACTHD doesn't move. I honestly can't say if that's actually a
realistic problem to hit it probably implies the timeout value is too
low."
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65394
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ben Widawsky <b...@bwidawsk.net>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
index 3b3f080..c046980 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
@@ -2341,21 +2341,21 @@ static bool i915_hangcheck_ring_idle(struct
intel_ring_buffer *ring,
return false;
}
-static bool semaphore_passed(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring)
+static struct intel_ring_buffer *
+semaphore_waits_for(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, u32 *seqno)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = ring->dev->dev_private;
- u32 acthd = intel_ring_get_active_head(ring) & HEAD_ADDR;
- struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller;
- u32 cmd, ipehr, acthd_min;
+ u32 cmd, ipehr, acthd, acthd_min;
ipehr = I915_READ(RING_IPEHR(ring->mmio_base));
if ((ipehr & ~(0x3 << 16)) !=
(MI_SEMAPHORE_MBOX | MI_SEMAPHORE_COMPARE | MI_SEMAPHORE_REGISTER))
- return false;
+ return NULL;
/* ACTHD is likely pointing to the dword after the actual command,
* so scan backwards until we find the MBOX.
*/
+ acthd = intel_ring_get_active_head(ring) & HEAD_ADDR;
acthd_min = max((int)acthd - 3 * 4, 0);
do {
cmd = ioread32(ring->virtual_start + acthd);
@@ -2364,12 +2364,40 @@ static bool semaphore_passed(struct intel_ring_buffer
*ring)
acthd -= 4;
if (acthd < acthd_min)
- return false;
+ return NULL;
} while (1);
- signaller = &dev_priv->ring[(ring->id + (((ipehr >> 17) & 1) + 1)) % 3];
- return i915_seqno_passed(signaller->get_seqno(signaller, false),
- ioread32(ring->virtual_start+acthd+4)+1);
+ *seqno = ioread32(ring->virtual_start+acthd+4)+1;
+ return &dev_priv->ring[(ring->id + (((ipehr >> 17) & 1) + 1)) % 3];
+}
+
+static int semaphore_passed(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring)
+{
+ struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = ring->dev->dev_private;
+ struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller;
+ u32 seqno, ctl;
+
+ ring->hangcheck.deadlock = true;
+
+ signaller = semaphore_waits_for(ring, &seqno);
+ if (signaller == NULL || signaller->hangcheck.deadlock)
+ return -1;
+
+ /* cursory check for an unkickable deadlock */
+ ctl = I915_READ_CTL(signaller);
+ if (ctl & RING_WAIT_SEMAPHORE && semaphore_passed(signaller) < 0)
+ return -1;
+
+ return i915_seqno_passed(signaller->get_seqno(signaller, false), seqno);
+}
+
+static void semaphore_clear_deadlocks(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
+{
+ struct intel_ring_buffer *ring;
+ int i;
+
+ for_each_ring(ring, dev_priv, i)
+ ring->hangcheck.deadlock = false;
}
static bool i915_hangcheck_ring_hung(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring)
@@ -2394,13 +2422,17 @@ static bool i915_hangcheck_ring_hung(struct
intel_ring_buffer *ring)
return false;
}
- if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 6 &&
- tmp & RING_WAIT_SEMAPHORE &&
- semaphore_passed(ring)) {
- DRM_ERROR("Kicking stuck semaphore on %s\n",
- ring->name);
- I915_WRITE_CTL(ring, tmp);
- return false;
+ if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 6 && tmp & RING_WAIT_SEMAPHORE) {
+ switch (semaphore_passed(ring)) {
+ default:
+ return true;
+ case 1:
+ DRM_ERROR("Kicking stuck semaphore on %s\n",
+ ring->name);
+ I915_WRITE_CTL(ring, tmp);
+ case 0:
+ return false;
+ }
}
return true;
@@ -2430,6 +2462,8 @@ void i915_hangcheck_elapsed(unsigned long data)
u32 seqno, acthd;
bool idle, err = false;
+ semaphore_clear_deadlocks(dev_priv);
+
seqno = ring->get_seqno(ring, false);
acthd = intel_ring_get_active_head(ring);
idle = i915_hangcheck_ring_idle(ring, seqno, &err);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
index efc403d..a3e9610 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ struct intel_hw_status_page {
#define I915_READ_SYNC_1(ring) I915_READ(RING_SYNC_1((ring)->mmio_base))
struct intel_ring_hangcheck {
+ bool deadlock;
u32 seqno;
u32 acthd;
int score;
--
1.7.10.4
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
