Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes: > While this is technically the batch as executed by the HW (in part at > least), it is confusing, and only used for a minority of gen. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@linux.intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c > index a35aad439281..796c9ce0c494 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c > @@ -1423,8 +1423,6 @@ intel_engine_coredump_add_request(struct > intel_engine_coredump *ee, > vma = request_record_user(rq, vma, gfp); > vma = capture_vma(vma, rq->ring->vma, "ring", gfp); > vma = capture_vma(vma, rq->context->state, "HW context", gfp); > - if (HAS_BROKEN_CS_TLB(rq->i915)) > - vma = capture_vma(vma, ee->engine->gt->scratch, "WA batch", > gfp); > > ee->rq_head = rq->head; > ee->rq_post = rq->postfix; > -- > 2.25.0.rc1 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
