On 19/12/11 03:02, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Use the dev_name(i915) to identify the requests for debugging, so we can
> tell different device timelines apart.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Venkata Sandeep Dhanalakota <venkata.s.dhanalak...@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
> index a6238c626a16..9646e02edea3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static struct i915_global_request {
>  
>  static const char *i915_fence_get_driver_name(struct dma_fence *fence)
>  {
> -     return "i915";
> +     return dev_name(to_request(fence)->i915->drm.dev);
>  }
>  
Sure, should we also update i915_fence_get_timeline_name() 
return to_request(fence)->gem_context->name ?:
i915_fence_get_driver_name(fence);
>  static const char *i915_fence_get_timeline_name(struct dma_fence *fence)
> -- 
> 2.24.0
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to