On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 02:33:07PM +0300, Mika Kuoppala wrote: > Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes: > > > It appears that a beneficial side-effect of Mika's more accurate hangman > > work is to speed up hang detection and execution. This exposes a bug in > > the reset code that then treats repeated simulated hangs as an > > indication that the machine is wedged. Jiggle the code around so that we > > only do the simulation processing from the hangcheck and avoid confusing > > it with a real hang. > > > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65060 > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > > Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@intel.com>
Queued for -next, thanks for the patch. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
