On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 19:20 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> We have another one of these in the wait_for register wait macro in
> intel_drv.h Can you please amend your patch with that fixed up, too?

I noticed it, but didn't change it since we don't need there the +1
adjustment to begin with. The time_after() check already makes sure we
wait at least MS amount. So I think we should remove +1 from there..

--Imre


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to