Quoting Daniel Vetter (2019-11-04 19:37:20) > So strictly speaking the existing annotation is also ok, because we > have a chain of > > obj->mm.lock#I915_MM_GET_PAGES -> fs_reclaim -> obj->mm.lock > > (the shrinker cannot get at an object while we're in get_pages, hence > this is safe). But it's confusing, so try to take the right subclass > of the lock. > > This does a bit reduce our lockdep based checking, but then it's also > less fragile, in case we ever change the nesting around. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@intel.com> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mi...@redhat.com> > Cc: Will Deacon <w...@kernel.org> > Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com> Regards, Joonas _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
