Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
> There is an unlikely corner case whereby a lockless wait may not notice
> a GPU hang and reset, and so continue to wait for the device to advance
> beyond the chosen seqno. This of course may never happen as the waiter
> may be the only user. Instead, we can explicitly advance the device
> seqno to match the requests that are forcibly retired following the
> hang.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index 84ee1f2..b3c8abd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -2118,8 +2118,11 @@ static void i915_gem_free_request(struct
> drm_i915_gem_request *request)
> }
>
> static void i915_gem_reset_ring_lists(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> - struct intel_ring_buffer *ring)
> + struct intel_ring_buffer *ring,
> + u32 seqno)
> {
> + int i;
> +
> while (!list_empty(&ring->request_list)) {
> struct drm_i915_gem_request *request;
>
> @@ -2139,6 +2142,10 @@ static void i915_gem_reset_ring_lists(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>
> i915_gem_object_move_to_inactive(obj);
> }
> +
> + intel_ring_init_seqno(ring, seqno);
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ring->sync_seqno); i++)
> + ring->sync_seqno[i] = 0;
> }
I remember pondering about resetting sync_seqno's
inside intel_ring_init_seqno(). Is there reason
not to?
> static void i915_gem_reset_fences(struct drm_device *dev)
> @@ -2167,10 +2174,14 @@ void i915_gem_reset(struct drm_device *dev)
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
> struct intel_ring_buffer *ring;
> + u32 seqno;
> int i;
>
> + if (i915_gem_get_seqno(dev, &seqno))
> + seqno = dev_priv->next_seqno - 1;
> +
> for_each_ring(ring, dev_priv, i)
> - i915_gem_reset_ring_lists(dev_priv, ring);
> + i915_gem_reset_ring_lists(dev_priv, ring, seqno);
>
> /* Move everything out of the GPU domains to ensure we do any
> * necessary invalidation upon reuse.
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
