On 05/08/2013 09:53 PM, Ben Widawsky wrote:
Bay Trail is the marketing name for the new Silvermont based SOCs we've been calling Valleyview. All recent Intel disclosed documents use the term "Bay Trail." AFAICT, only leaked docs (and our code) use the term Valleyview. I've also verified with internal sources that references to, "Valleyview" should be dropped.Why? We've always strived to make the already confusing generation information as clear as possible in our driver. With the introduction of the below, we made two names referring to the exact same silicon. commit 93c34e70ebf464a9ee142d93b681c5df094ec654 Author: Kenneth Graunke <kenn...@whitecape.org> Date: Mon Apr 22 00:53:50 2013 -0700 drm/i915: Fix page table entries for Bay Trail. While it's tempting to simply do the renames in Ken's patch, it's simply not correct. As an added bonus, Mesa also uses the byt/baytrail names. Yes. I know this is painful. Doing it now is the least painful way to do this right (short of going back in time.) disclaimer: only compile tested. disclaimer2: I didn't fix pre-existing checkpatch issues. CC: Kenneth Graunke <kenn...@whitecape.org> CC: Jesse Barnes <jbar...@virtuousgeek.org> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <b...@bwidawsk.net>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenn...@whitecape.org> _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
