Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-10-17 10:44:59) > From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com> > > Medium term goal is to eliminate the i915->engine[] array and to get there > we have recently introduced equivalent array in intel_gt. Now we need to > migrate the code further towards this state. > > This next step is to eliminate usage of i915->engines[] from the > for_each_engine_masked iterator. > > For this to work we also need to use engine->id as index when populating > the gt->engine[] array and adjust the default engine set indexing to use > engine->legacy_idx instead of assuming gt->engines[] indexing. > > v2: > * Populate gt->engine[] earlier. > > Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com> > Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
I checked all the legacy_idx to make sure there wasn't anything nasty there, and it all looked okay. So once we have the early foible sorted out, Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
