On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 04:23:06PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> Ok ok I'm sold, at least until we find otherwise or Alan's team reports
> back that the GTT space is needed.
> 
> Extending the interface to not reserve GTT space makes sense; I can do
> that as a follow up, if you're ok with the existing code.

I'm happy with the rest of the patch - just wishing that the size was
expressed in pages (6 * GTT_PAGE_SIZE) and similarly the mask
~(GTT_PAGE_SIZE-1).

Bring on the change to avoid reserving GTT space and lets hope it
sticks! :)
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to