On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 01:28:23PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 23:15:30 -0700
> Ben Widawsky <b...@bwidawsk.net> wrote:
>
> > Because PPGTT PDEs within the GTT are calculated in cachelines
> > (HW guys consistency ftw) we do a divide which will wreak havoc if this
> > is wrong, and I know that from experience).
> >
> > If/when we move to multiple PPGTTs this will have to become a WARN, and
> > return an error. For now however it should always be considered fatal,
> > and only a developer could hit it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <b...@bwidawsk.net>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> > index 50df194..0503f09 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> > @@ -85,6 +85,8 @@ static int gen6_ppgtt_enable(struct drm_device *dev)
> > uint32_t pd_entry;
> > int i;
> >
> > + BUG_ON(ppgtt->pd_offset & 0x3f);
> > +
> > pd_addr = (gen6_gtt_pte_t __iomem*)dev_priv->gtt.gsm +
> > ppgtt->pd_offset / sizeof(gen6_gtt_pte_t);
> > for (i = 0; i < ppgtt->num_pd_entries; i++) {
>
> Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbar...@virtuousgeek.org>
Queued for -next with the same s/BUG/WARN bikeshed, thanks for the patch.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
