On 21/09/2019 10:55, Chris Wilson wrote:
Pull setting -EIO on the hung requests into its own utility function.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 32 +++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
index 1a2b71157f08..53e823d36b28 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
@@ -234,6 +234,13 @@ static void execlists_init_reg_state(u32 *reg_state,
struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
struct intel_ring *ring);
+static void mark_eio(struct i915_request *rq)
+{
+ if (!i915_request_signaled(rq))
+ dma_fence_set_error(&rq->fence, -EIO);
+ i915_request_mark_complete(rq);
+}
+
static inline u32 intel_hws_preempt_address(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
{
return (i915_ggtt_offset(engine->status_page.vma) +
@@ -2501,12 +2508,8 @@ static void execlists_cancel_requests(struct
intel_engine_cs *engine)
__execlists_reset(engine, true);
/* Mark all executing requests as skipped. */
- list_for_each_entry(rq, &engine->active.requests, sched.link) {
- if (!i915_request_signaled(rq))
- dma_fence_set_error(&rq->fence, -EIO);
-
- i915_request_mark_complete(rq);
- }
+ list_for_each_entry(rq, &engine->active.requests, sched.link)
+ mark_eio(rq);
/* Flush the queued requests to the timeline list (for retiring). */
while ((rb = rb_first_cached(&execlists->queue))) {
@@ -2514,10 +2517,8 @@ static void execlists_cancel_requests(struct
intel_engine_cs *engine)
int i;
priolist_for_each_request_consume(rq, rn, p, i) {
- list_del_init(&rq->sched.link);
list_del_init not needed any more? Should be mentioned in the commit
message.
+ mark_eio(rq);
__i915_request_submit(rq);
- dma_fence_set_error(&rq->fence, -EIO);
- i915_request_mark_complete(rq);
I am also curious about Mika's question - if the change in ordering of
submit vs mark_complete is important it should be mentioned in the commit.
}
rb_erase_cached(&p->node, &execlists->queue);
@@ -2533,13 +2534,14 @@ static void execlists_cancel_requests(struct
intel_engine_cs *engine)
RB_CLEAR_NODE(rb);
spin_lock(&ve->base.active.lock);
- if (ve->request) {
- ve->request->engine = engine;
- __i915_request_submit(ve->request);
- dma_fence_set_error(&ve->request->fence, -EIO);
- i915_request_mark_complete(ve->request);
+ rq = fetch_and_zero(&ve->request);
+ if (rq) {
+ mark_eio(rq);
+
+ rq->engine = engine;
+ __i915_request_submit(rq);
+
ve->base.execlists.queue_priority_hint = INT_MIN;
- ve->request = NULL;
}
spin_unlock(&ve->base.active.lock);
}
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
