Forcewake handling is a prime suspect now. Keep ref
always on tgl to test the theory and reveal the coverage.
Testcase: igt/gem_sync
Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 141024c66f36..2ab970b4d534 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -1144,7 +1144,10 @@ void i915_gem_sanitize(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
*/
intel_gt_sanitize(&i915->gt, false);
- intel_uncore_forcewake_put(&i915->uncore, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
+ /* XXX Forcewake handling is a prime suspect now */
+ if (INTEL_GEN(i915) < 12)
+ intel_uncore_forcewake_put(&i915->uncore, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
+
intel_runtime_pm_put(&i915->runtime_pm, wakeref);
}
--
2.17.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
