On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 04:46:12PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 02:04:25PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Instead of repeatedly bombarding the user with a request to reboot and
> > increase the stolen size with every fb refresh, just inform them the
> > first time only.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 3 +--
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > index 3534a71..05bc0a4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > @@ -481,8 +481,7 @@ void intel_update_fbc(struct drm_device *dev)
> > goto out_disable;
> >
> > if (i915_gem_stolen_setup_compression(dev, intel_fb->obj->base.size)) {
> > - DRM_INFO("not enough stolen space for compressed buffer (need
> > %zd bytes), disabling\n", intel_fb->obj->base.size);
> > - DRM_INFO("hint: you may be able to increase stolen memory size
> > in the BIOS to avoid this\n");
> > + pr_info_once("not enough stolen space for compressed buffer
> > (need %zd bytes), disabling. Hint: you may be able to inrease stolen memory
> > size in hte BIOS to avoid this.\n", intel_fb->obj->base.size);
> s/hte/the/ in the above line while at it?
The other problem is that we drop the "drm: ", so perhaps we should add
that back in (or start using "drm/i915: " or "i915: ").
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
