On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:19:20AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Our rps code relies on the interrupts being off to prevent re-arming > of the work items at inopportune moments. > > Also drop the redundant cancel_work for the main rps work, > disable_gt_powersave already takes care of that. > > Finally add a WARN_ON to ensure we obey that piece of ordering > constraint. Long term I want to lock down the setup/teardown code in a > similar way to how we painstakingly check modeset sequence constraints > already.
Reminds me, did we every get around to flushing our deferred hw tasks upon suspend? I've a funny feeling that is still missing. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
