We don't call the init_early function from within the gem code, so we
shouldn't do it for the cleanup either.

Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospu...@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 2 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 2 --
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
index f2d3d754af37..934e605e2466 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
@@ -951,6 +951,7 @@ static int i915_driver_early_probe(struct drm_i915_private 
*dev_priv)
        intel_uc_cleanup_early(&dev_priv->gt.uc);
        i915_gem_cleanup_early(dev_priv);
 err_workqueues:
+       intel_gt_cleanup_early(&dev_priv->gt);
        i915_workqueues_cleanup(dev_priv);
        return ret;
 }
@@ -966,6 +967,7 @@ static void i915_driver_late_release(struct 
drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
        intel_power_domains_cleanup(dev_priv);
        intel_uc_cleanup_early(&dev_priv->gt.uc);
        i915_gem_cleanup_early(dev_priv);
+       intel_gt_cleanup_early(&dev_priv->gt);
        i915_workqueues_cleanup(dev_priv);
 
        pm_qos_remove_request(&dev_priv->sb_qos);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index ae4e7cc3e3f9..2c7dc3404759 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -1674,8 +1674,6 @@ void i915_gem_cleanup_early(struct drm_i915_private 
*dev_priv)
        GEM_BUG_ON(atomic_read(&dev_priv->mm.free_count));
        WARN_ON(dev_priv->mm.shrink_count);
 
-       intel_gt_cleanup_early(&dev_priv->gt);
-
        i915_gemfs_fini(dev_priv);
 }
 
-- 
2.22.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to