From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com>
We have the exact same comment inside intel_init_display. This is
a leftover from when we moved a lot of code from intel_display.c to
intel_pm.c.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index baea4fc..a175984 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -4191,7 +4191,6 @@ void intel_init_pm(struct drm_device *dev)
}
dev_priv->display.init_clock_gating =
gen6_init_clock_gating;
} else if (IS_IVYBRIDGE(dev)) {
- /* FIXME: detect B0+ stepping and use auto training */
if (SNB_READ_WM0_LATENCY()) {
dev_priv->display.update_wm =
ivybridge_update_wm;
dev_priv->display.update_sprite_wm =
sandybridge_update_sprite_wm;
--
1.7.10.4
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
