On 23/07/2019 16:49, Stuart Summers wrote:
Currently, the subslice_mask runtime parameter is stored as an
array of subslices per slice. Expand the subslice mask array to
better match what is presented to userspace through the
I915_QUERY_TOPOLOGY_INFO ioctl. The index into this array is
then calculated:
   slice * subslice stride + subslice index / 8

Signed-off-by: Stuart Summers <stuart.summ...@intel.com>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.c        | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++-
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h        |  5 +++-
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c |  3 +--
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c         |  5 +++-
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c    |  8 +++----
  5 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.c
index 607c1447287c..7abc2487b994 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.c
@@ -30,6 +30,30 @@ intel_sseu_subslice_total(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu)
        return total;
  }
+u32 intel_sseu_get_subslices(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu, u8 slice)
+{
+       int i, offset = slice * sseu->ss_stride;
+       u32 mask = 0;
+
+       if (slice >= sseu->max_slices) {
+               DRM_ERROR("%s: invalid slice %d, max: %d\n",
+                         __func__, slice, sseu->max_slices);
+               return 0;
+       }
+
+       if (sseu->ss_stride > sizeof(mask)) {
+               DRM_ERROR("%s: invalid subslice stride %d, max: %lu\n",
+                         __func__, sseu->ss_stride, sizeof(mask));
+               return 0;
+       }
+
+       for (i = 0; i < sseu->ss_stride; i++)
+               mask |= (u32)sseu->subslice_mask[offset + i] <<
+                       i * BITS_PER_BYTE;
+
+       return mask;
+}

Why do you actually need these complications when the plan from the start was that the driver and user sseu representation structures can be different?

I only gave it a quick look so I might be wrong, but why not just expand the driver representations of subslice mask up from u8? Userspace API should be able to cope with strides already.

Regards,

Tvrtko

+
  void intel_sseu_set_subslices(struct sseu_dev_info *sseu, int slice,
                              u32 ss_mask)
  {
@@ -43,7 +67,7 @@ void intel_sseu_set_subslices(struct sseu_dev_info *sseu, int 
slice,
  unsigned int
  intel_sseu_subslices_per_slice(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu, u8 slice)
  {
-       return hweight8(sseu->subslice_mask[slice]);
+       return hweight32(intel_sseu_get_subslices(sseu, slice));
  }
u32 intel_sseu_make_rpcs(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h
index 0ecc1c35a7a1..2291764b7db5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h
@@ -15,10 +15,11 @@ struct drm_i915_private;
  #define GEN_MAX_SLICES                (6) /* CNL upper bound */
  #define GEN_MAX_SUBSLICES     (8) /* ICL upper bound */
  #define GEN_SSEU_STRIDE(max_entries) DIV_ROUND_UP(max_entries, BITS_PER_BYTE)
+#define GEN_MAX_SUBSLICE_STRIDE GEN_SSEU_STRIDE(GEN_MAX_SUBSLICES)
struct sseu_dev_info {
        u8 slice_mask;
-       u8 subslice_mask[GEN_MAX_SLICES];
+       u8 subslice_mask[GEN_MAX_SLICES * GEN_MAX_SUBSLICE_STRIDE];
        u16 eu_total;
        u8 eu_per_subslice;
        u8 min_eu_in_pool;
@@ -85,6 +86,8 @@ intel_sseu_subslice_total(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu);
  unsigned int
  intel_sseu_subslices_per_slice(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu, u8 slice);
+u32 intel_sseu_get_subslices(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu, u8 slice);
+
  void intel_sseu_set_subslices(struct sseu_dev_info *sseu, int slice,
                              u32 ss_mask);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
index 704ace01e7f5..7ec60435d871 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
@@ -794,8 +794,7 @@ wa_init_mcr(struct drm_i915_private *i915, struct 
i915_wa_list *wal)
        }
slice = fls(sseu->slice_mask) - 1;
-       GEM_BUG_ON(slice >= ARRAY_SIZE(sseu->subslice_mask));
-       subslice = fls(l3_en & sseu->subslice_mask[slice]);
+       subslice = fls(l3_en & intel_sseu_get_subslices(sseu, slice));
        if (!subslice) {
                DRM_WARN("No common index found between subslice mask %x and L3 bank 
mask %x!\n",
                         sseu->subslice_mask[slice], l3_en);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
index 7f842506b9ea..96a25a770ade 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -3944,13 +3944,16 @@ static void gen9_sseu_device_status(struct 
drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
for (ss = 0; ss < info->sseu.max_subslices; ss++) {
                        unsigned int eu_cnt;
+                       u8 ss_idx = s * info->sseu.ss_stride +
+                                   ss / BITS_PER_BYTE;
if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv)) {
                                if (!(s_reg[s] & (GEN9_PGCTL_SS_ACK(ss))))
                                        /* skip disabled subslice */
                                        continue;
- sseu->subslice_mask[s] |= BIT(ss);
+                               sseu->subslice_mask[ss_idx] |=
+                                       BIT(ss % BITS_PER_BYTE);
                        }
eu_cnt = 2 * hweight32(eu_reg[2*s + ss/2] &
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
index 723b1fde5fc4..04dde4f204c3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
@@ -93,9 +93,9 @@ static void sseu_dump(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu, 
struct drm_printer *p)
                   hweight8(sseu->slice_mask), sseu->slice_mask);
        drm_printf(p, "subslice total: %u\n", intel_sseu_subslice_total(sseu));
        for (s = 0; s < sseu->max_slices; s++) {
-               drm_printf(p, "slice%d: %u subslices, mask=%04x\n",
+               drm_printf(p, "slice%d: %u subslices, mask=%08x\n",
                           s, intel_sseu_subslices_per_slice(sseu, s),
-                          sseu->subslice_mask[s]);
+                          intel_sseu_get_subslices(sseu, s));
        }
        drm_printf(p, "EU total: %u\n", sseu->eu_total);
        drm_printf(p, "EU per subslice: %u\n", sseu->eu_per_subslice);
@@ -159,9 +159,9 @@ void intel_device_info_dump_topology(const struct 
sseu_dev_info *sseu,
        }
for (s = 0; s < sseu->max_slices; s++) {
-               drm_printf(p, "slice%d: %u subslice(s) (0x%hhx):\n",
+               drm_printf(p, "slice%d: %u subslice(s) (0x%08x):\n",
                           s, intel_sseu_subslices_per_slice(sseu, s),
-                          sseu->subslice_mask[s]);
+                          intel_sseu_get_subslices(sseu, s));
for (ss = 0; ss < sseu->max_subslices; ss++) {
                        u16 enabled_eus = sseu_get_eus(sseu, s, ss);

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to