As we only update and sanitize the return timeout value after a
successful wait, we should not assert that it is valid for any error
returns. Also, for consistency, we should only modify args->timeout_ns
upon success.

Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ben Widawsky <b...@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 63c05dd..da78cf7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -2377,7 +2377,7 @@ i915_gem_wait_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, 
struct drm_file *file)
        mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
 
        ret = __wait_seqno(ring, seqno, reset_counter, true, timeout);
-       if (timeout) {
+       if (ret == 0 && timeout) {
                WARN_ON(!timespec_valid(timeout));
                args->timeout_ns = timespec_to_ns(timeout);
        }
-- 
1.7.10.4

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to