Matthew pointed out that we could face a double failure with concurrent
allocations/frees, and so the assumption that the local var alloc was
NULL was fraught with danger. Rather than complicate the error paths too
much to add a second local for a second free, just do the second free
earlier on the unwind path.

Reported-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.a...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.a...@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
index 1065753e86fb..9756f1b670e9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
@@ -1484,6 +1484,10 @@ static int gen8_ppgtt_alloc_pdp(struct 
i915_address_space *vm,
        goto out;
 
 unwind_pd:
+       if (alloc) {
+               free_pd(vm, alloc);
+               alloc = NULL;
+       }
        spin_lock(&pdp->lock);
        if (atomic_dec_and_test(&pd->used)) {
                gen8_ppgtt_set_pdpe(pdp, vm->scratch_pd, pdpe);
@@ -1556,6 +1560,10 @@ static int gen8_ppgtt_alloc_4lvl(struct 
i915_address_space *vm,
        goto out;
 
 unwind_pdp:
+       if (alloc) {
+               free_pd(vm, alloc);
+               alloc = NULL;
+       }
        spin_lock(&pml4->lock);
        if (atomic_dec_and_test(&pdp->used)) {
                gen8_ppgtt_set_pml4e(pml4, vm->scratch_pdp, pml4e);
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to