On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 2:36 PM Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch> wrote: > > We're kinda going in the wrong direction. Spotted while typing better > gem/prime docs. > > Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmerm...@suse.de> > Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com> > Cc: Rob Herring <r...@kernel.org> > Cc: Noralf Trønnes <nor...@tronnes.org> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@intel.com> > --- > Documentation/gpu/todo.rst | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst b/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst > index b4a76c2703e5..23583f0e3755 100644 > --- a/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst > +++ b/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst > @@ -228,6 +228,10 @@ struct drm_gem_object_funcs > GEM objects can now have a function table instead of having the callbacks on > the > DRM driver struct. This is now the preferred way and drivers can be moved > over. > > +Unfortunately some of the recently added GEM helpers are going in the wrong > +direction by adding OPS macros that use the old, deprecated hooks. See > +DRM_GEM_CMA_VMAP_DRIVER_OPS, DRM_GEM_SHMEM_DRIVER_OPS, and > DRM_GEM_VRAM_DRIVER_PRIME.
At least for DRM_GEM_SHMEM_DRIVER_OPS, it should just be a matter of removing in the single user (cirrus) and deleting the macro. Rob _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
