On 14/06/2019 08:10, Chris Wilson wrote:
If we enter i915_request_wait() with an already completed request, but
unsignaled dma-fence, signal the fence before returning. This allows us
to execute any of the signal callbacks at the earliest opportunity.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
index ead68a2ffeac..a82f3ff82b39 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
@@ -1392,7 +1392,7 @@ long i915_request_wait(struct i915_request *rq,
        might_sleep();
        GEM_BUG_ON(timeout < 0);
- if (i915_request_completed(rq))
+       if (dma_fence_is_signaled(&rq->fence))
                return timeout;
if (!timeout)


Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to