On 21/05/2019 08:57, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-05-20 15:47:14)
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>

gem_wsim uses the sw_fence timeline and confuses the script.

v2:
  * Check the correct timeline as well. (Chris)

Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
---
  scripts/trace.pl | 3 +++
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/scripts/trace.pl b/scripts/trace.pl
index 8c896cfde6b0..ac141a514055 100755
--- a/scripts/trace.pl
+++ b/scripts/trace.pl
@@ -443,6 +443,9 @@ while (<>) {
         } elsif ($tp_name eq 'dma_fence:dma_fence_signaled:') {
                 my $nkey;
+ next unless $tp{'driver'} eq 'i915' and
+                           $tp{'timeline'} eq 'signaled';

Hopefully that remains unique...
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>

I do recall wanting to remove the strings from all the tracepoints :-p

Eeek.. let's try and not make the request tracing ability even more useless.

Because for trace.pl the decoupled from actual request completion nature of dma_fence_signaled is depressing enough. I wonder how better tracing tools view/cope with this.

And I'd also write to Santa to wire me up a real request start, to distinguish semaphores vs batch execution. In the realm of impossible wishes yeah.

Persistent breadcrumbs while tracing is another one for which even there was a patch some time back.

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to