To simplify the next patch, update bump_priority and schedule to accept
the internal i915_sched_ndoe directly and not expect a request pointer.

add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 2/1 up/down: 8/-15 (-7)
Function                                     old     new   delta
i915_schedule_bump_priority                  109     113      +4
i915_schedule                                 50      54      +4
__i915_schedule                              922     907     -15

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c | 33 +++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
index 834b10ad4ce1..05eb50558aba 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ static bool kick_tasklet(const struct intel_engine_cs 
*engine, int prio)
        return i915_scheduler_need_preempt(prio, rq_prio(inflight));
 }
 
-static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_request *rq,
+static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_sched_node *rq,
                            const struct i915_sched_attr *attr)
 {
        struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
@@ -193,13 +193,13 @@ static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_request *rq,
        lockdep_assert_held(&schedule_lock);
        GEM_BUG_ON(prio == I915_PRIORITY_INVALID);
 
-       if (i915_request_completed(rq))
+       if (prio <= READ_ONCE(rq->attr.priority))
                return;
 
-       if (prio <= READ_ONCE(rq->sched.attr.priority))
+       if (node_signaled(rq))
                return;
 
-       stack.signaler = &rq->sched;
+       stack.signaler = rq;
        list_add(&stack.dfs_link, &dfs);
 
        /*
@@ -250,9 +250,9 @@ static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_request *rq,
         * execlists_submit_request()), we can set our own priority and skip
         * acquiring the engine locks.
         */
-       if (rq->sched.attr.priority == I915_PRIORITY_INVALID) {
-               GEM_BUG_ON(!list_empty(&rq->sched.link));
-               rq->sched.attr = *attr;
+       if (rq->attr.priority == I915_PRIORITY_INVALID) {
+               GEM_BUG_ON(!list_empty(&rq->link));
+               rq->attr = *attr;
 
                if (stack.dfs_link.next == stack.dfs_link.prev)
                        return;
@@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_request *rq,
        }
 
        memset(&cache, 0, sizeof(cache));
-       engine = rq->engine;
+       engine = node_to_request(rq)->engine;
        spin_lock(&engine->timeline.lock);
 
        /* Fifo and depth-first replacement ensure our deps execute before us */
@@ -319,13 +319,20 @@ static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_request *rq,
 void i915_schedule(struct i915_request *rq, const struct i915_sched_attr *attr)
 {
        spin_lock_irq(&schedule_lock);
-       __i915_schedule(rq, attr);
+       __i915_schedule(&rq->sched, attr);
        spin_unlock_irq(&schedule_lock);
 }
 
+static void __bump_priority(struct i915_sched_node *node, unsigned int bump)
+{
+       struct i915_sched_attr attr = node->attr;
+
+       attr.priority |= bump;
+       __i915_schedule(node, &attr);
+}
+
 void i915_schedule_bump_priority(struct i915_request *rq, unsigned int bump)
 {
-       struct i915_sched_attr attr;
        unsigned long flags;
 
        GEM_BUG_ON(bump & ~I915_PRIORITY_MASK);
@@ -334,11 +341,7 @@ void i915_schedule_bump_priority(struct i915_request *rq, 
unsigned int bump)
                return;
 
        spin_lock_irqsave(&schedule_lock, flags);
-
-       attr = rq->sched.attr;
-       attr.priority |= bump;
-       __i915_schedule(rq, &attr);
-
+       __bump_priority(&rq->sched, bump);
        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&schedule_lock, flags);
 }
 
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to