+Tony to comment on the media-driver views on this.

+Manually re-adding original Cc which did not appear for me from the ML.

On 12/04/2019 07:51, Chris Wilson wrote:
SSEU reprogramming of the context introduced the notion of engine class
and instance for a forwards compatible method of describing any engine
beyond the old execbuf interface. We wish to adopt this class:instance
description for more interfaces, so pull it out into a separate type for
userspace convenience.

References: e46c2e99f600 ("drm/i915: Expose RPCS (SSEU) configuration to userspace 
(Gen11 only)")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwer...@intel.com>
Cc: Dmitry Rogozhkin <dmitry.v.rogozh...@intel.com>
Cc: Andi Shyti <a...@etezian.org>
---
Commit e46c2e99f600 ("drm/i915: Expose RPCS (SSEU) configuration to
userspace (Gen11 only)") is for v5.1, so we still do have a tiny bit of
time to enact this change.
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c |  8 ++++----
  include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h             | 11 +++++++++--
  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
index 7fc34ab6df87..dd728b26b5aa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
@@ -1386,8 +1386,8 @@ static int set_sseu(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
                return -EINVAL;
engine = intel_engine_lookup_user(i915,
-                                         user_sseu.engine_class,
-                                         user_sseu.engine_instance);
+                                         user_sseu.engine.engine_class,
+                                         user_sseu.engine.engine_instance);
        if (!engine)
                return -EINVAL;
@@ -1626,8 +1626,8 @@ static int get_sseu(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
                return -EINVAL;
engine = intel_engine_lookup_user(ctx->i915,
-                                         user_sseu.engine_class,
-                                         user_sseu.engine_instance);
+                                         user_sseu.engine.engine_class,
+                                         user_sseu.engine.engine_instance);
        if (!engine)
                return -EINVAL;
diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
index 52051d24d89d..f6369c462458 100644
--- a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
+++ b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
@@ -1500,6 +1500,14 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_context_param {
        __u64 value;
  };
+union drm_i915_engine_class_instance {
+       struct i915_engine_class_instance {
+               __u16 engine_class;
+               __u16 engine_instance;
+       } class_instance;
+       __u32 ci;

Is "ci" class instance or something to satisfy the test farm and what is the purpose for the union?

+};
+
  /**
   * Context SSEU programming
   *
@@ -1525,8 +1533,7 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_context_param_sseu {
        /*
         * Engine class & instance to be configured or queried.
         */
-       __u16 engine_class;
-       __u16 engine_instance;
+       struct i915_engine_class_instance engine;
/*
         * Unused for now. Must be cleared to zero.


Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to