On Tue, 09 Apr 2019 23:27:41 +0200,
Chris Wilson wrote:
> 
> In runtime_resume, we release the local display_power wakeref if we can
> rely on i915 providing a wakeref along the component. On suspend
> therefore, we should only release the display_power if we kept it from
> runtime_resume.

Hrm, it shouldn't matter.  After the recent code rewrite, the control
isn't refcount any longer, hence it's fine to call
display_power(false) again even if it were already powered off.


thanks,

Takashi

> 
> Fixes: e454ff8e89b6 ("ALSA: hda/intel: Drop superfluous 
> AZX_DCAPS_I915_POWERWELL checks")
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Takashi Iwai <ti...@suse.de>
> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com>
> ---
> This appears to fix the glk-dsi as it performs a pm_runtime_suspend in
> the middle of azx_probe_contime(). Hopefully.
> ---
>  sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c b/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c
> index 2ec91085fa3e..a9faf95c88b5 100644
> --- a/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c
> +++ b/sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c
> @@ -941,10 +941,14 @@ static bool azx_is_pm_ready(struct snd_card *card)
>  
>  static void __azx_runtime_suspend(struct azx *chip)
>  {
> +     struct hda_intel *hda = container_of(chip, struct hda_intel, chip);
> +
>       azx_stop_chip(chip);
>       azx_enter_link_reset(chip);
>       azx_clear_irq_pending(chip);
> -     display_power(chip, false);
> +
> +     if (hda->need_i915_power)
> +             display_power(chip, false);
>  }
>  
>  static void __azx_runtime_resume(struct azx *chip, bool from_rt)
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to