Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-03-18 09:52:56) > From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com> > > This allows the IS_PINEVIEW_<G|M> macros to be removed and avoid > duplication of device ids already defined in i915_pciids.h. > > !IS_MOBILE check can be used in place of existing IS_PINEVIEW_G call > sites. > > Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com> > Suggested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
I'll let Ville decide or not, but the conversion looks correct for me. All IS_PINEVIEW* accounted for. I am suspicious of the IS_PINEVIEW in i9xx_setup_backlight, but it's probably just that the desktop chipset can't reach that far. Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
