On Mon, 25 Feb 2019, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
>
> Life will be easier later if we have the ranks stored
> as a bare number.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 92 +++++++++++++++------------------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 11 ++--
>  2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> index c6354f6cdbdb..48c6bc44072d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> @@ -1068,28 +1068,28 @@ static void intel_sanitize_options(struct 
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>       intel_gvt_sanitize_options(dev_priv);
>  }
>  
> -static enum dram_rank skl_get_dimm_rank(u8 size, u32 rank)
> +static int skl_get_dimm_ranks(u8 size, u32 rank)
>  {
>       if (size == 0)
> -             return I915_DRAM_RANK_INVALID;
> +             return 0;
>       if (rank == SKL_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE)
> -             return I915_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE;
> +             return 1;
>       else if (rank == SKL_DRAM_RANK_DUAL)
> -             return I915_DRAM_RANK_DUAL;
> +             return 2;
>  
> -     return I915_DRAM_RANK_INVALID;
> +     return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static bool
> -skl_is_16gb_dimm(enum dram_rank rank, u8 size, u8 width)
> +skl_is_16gb_dimm(u8 ranks, u8 size, u8 width)
>  {
> -     if (rank == I915_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE && width == 8 && size == 16)
> +     if (ranks == 1 && width == 8 && size == 16)
>               return true;
> -     else if (rank == I915_DRAM_RANK_DUAL && width == 8 && size == 32)
> +     else if (ranks == 2 && width == 8 && size == 32)
>               return true;
> -     else if (rank == SKL_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE && width == 16 && size == 8)
> +     else if (ranks == 1 && width == 16 && size == 8)
>               return true;
> -     else if (rank == SKL_DRAM_RANK_DUAL && width == 16 && size == 16)
> +     else if (ranks == 2 && width == 16 && size == 16)
>               return true;
>  
>       return false;
> @@ -1120,28 +1120,24 @@ skl_dram_get_channel_info(struct dram_channel_info 
> *ch, u32 val)
>  
>       tmp_l = val & SKL_DRAM_RANK_MASK;
>       tmp_s = s_val & SKL_DRAM_RANK_MASK;
> -     ch->l_info.rank = skl_get_dimm_rank(ch->l_info.size, tmp_l);
> -     ch->s_info.rank = skl_get_dimm_rank(ch->s_info.size, tmp_s);
> -
> -     if (ch->l_info.rank == I915_DRAM_RANK_DUAL ||
> -         ch->s_info.rank == I915_DRAM_RANK_DUAL)
> -             ch->rank = I915_DRAM_RANK_DUAL;
> -     else if (ch->l_info.rank == I915_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE &&
> -              ch->s_info.rank == I915_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE)
> -             ch->rank = I915_DRAM_RANK_DUAL;
> +     ch->l_info.ranks = skl_get_dimm_ranks(ch->l_info.size, tmp_l);
> +     ch->s_info.ranks = skl_get_dimm_ranks(ch->s_info.size, tmp_s);
> +
> +     if (ch->l_info.ranks == 2 || ch->s_info.ranks == 2)
> +             ch->ranks = 2;
> +     else if (ch->l_info.ranks == 1 && ch->s_info.ranks == 1)
> +             ch->ranks = 2;
>       else
> -             ch->rank = I915_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE;
> +             ch->ranks = 1;
>  
> -     ch->is_16gb_dimm = skl_is_16gb_dimm(ch->l_info.rank, ch->l_info.size,
> +     ch->is_16gb_dimm = skl_is_16gb_dimm(ch->l_info.ranks, ch->l_info.size,
>                                           ch->l_info.width) ||
> -                        skl_is_16gb_dimm(ch->s_info.rank, ch->s_info.size,
> +                        skl_is_16gb_dimm(ch->s_info.ranks, ch->s_info.size,
>                                           ch->s_info.width);
>  
> -     DRM_DEBUG_KMS("(size:width:rank) L(%dGB:X%d:%s) S(%dGB:X%d:%s)\n",
> -                   ch->l_info.size, ch->l_info.width,
> -                   ch->l_info.rank ? "dual" : "single",
> -                   ch->s_info.size, ch->s_info.width,
> -                   ch->s_info.rank ? "dual" : "single");

I don't understand how the above ternary operators could ever have
produced the right results before.

> +     DRM_DEBUG_KMS("(size:width:ranks) L(%dGB:X%d:%d) S(%dGB:X%d:%d)\n",
> +                   ch->l_info.size, ch->l_info.width, ch->l_info.ranks,
> +                   ch->s_info.size, ch->s_info.width, ch->s_info.ranks);

%u instead of %d? Ditto for all debug prints.

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>


>  
>       return 0;
>  }
> @@ -1154,7 +1150,7 @@ intel_is_dram_symmetric(u32 val_ch0, u32 val_ch1,
>               (ch0->s_info.size == 0 ||
>                (ch0->l_info.size == ch0->s_info.size &&
>                 ch0->l_info.width == ch0->s_info.width &&
> -               ch0->l_info.rank == ch0->s_info.rank)));
> +               ch0->l_info.ranks == ch0->s_info.ranks)));
>  }
>  
>  static int
> @@ -1185,13 +1181,12 @@ skl_dram_get_channels_info(struct drm_i915_private 
> *dev_priv)
>        * will be same as if single rank memory, so consider single rank
>        * memory.
>        */
> -     if (ch0.rank == I915_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE ||
> -         ch1.rank == I915_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE)
> -             dram_info->rank = I915_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE;
> +     if (ch0.ranks == 1 || ch1.ranks == 1)
> +             dram_info->ranks = 1;
>       else
> -             dram_info->rank = max(ch0.rank, ch1.rank);
> +             dram_info->ranks = max(ch0.ranks, ch1.ranks);
>  
> -     if (dram_info->rank == I915_DRAM_RANK_INVALID) {
> +     if (dram_info->ranks == 0) {
>               DRM_INFO("couldn't get memory rank information\n");
>               return -EINVAL;
>       }
> @@ -1262,8 +1257,7 @@ bxt_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>        * Now read each DUNIT8/9/10/11 to check the rank of each dimms.
>        */
>       for (i = BXT_D_CR_DRP0_DUNIT_START; i <= BXT_D_CR_DRP0_DUNIT_END; i++) {
> -             u8 size, width;
> -             enum dram_rank rank;
> +             u8 size, width, ranks;
>               u32 tmp;
>  
>               val = I915_READ(BXT_D_CR_DRP0_DUNIT(i));
> @@ -1274,11 +1268,11 @@ bxt_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>               tmp = val & BXT_DRAM_RANK_MASK;
>  
>               if (tmp == BXT_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE)
> -                     rank = I915_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE;
> +                     ranks = 1;
>               else if (tmp == BXT_DRAM_RANK_DUAL)
> -                     rank = I915_DRAM_RANK_DUAL;
> +                     ranks = 2;
>               else
> -                     rank = I915_DRAM_RANK_INVALID;
> +                     ranks = 0;
>  
>               tmp = val & BXT_DRAM_SIZE_MASK;
>               if (tmp == BXT_DRAM_SIZE_4GB)
> @@ -1296,22 +1290,21 @@ bxt_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  
>               tmp = (val & BXT_DRAM_WIDTH_MASK) >> BXT_DRAM_WIDTH_SHIFT;
>               width = (1 << tmp) * 8;
> -             DRM_DEBUG_KMS("dram size:%dGB width:X%d rank:%s\n", size,
> -                           width, rank == I915_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE ? "single" :
> -                           rank == I915_DRAM_RANK_DUAL ? "dual" : "unknown");
> +             DRM_DEBUG_KMS("dram size:%dGB width:X%d ranks:%d\n",
> +                           size, width, ranks);
>  
>               /*
>                * If any of the channel is single rank channel,
>                * worst case output will be same as if single rank
>                * memory, so consider single rank memory.
>                */
> -             if (dram_info->rank == I915_DRAM_RANK_INVALID)
> -                     dram_info->rank = rank;
> -             else if (rank == I915_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE)
> -                     dram_info->rank = I915_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE;
> +             if (dram_info->ranks == 0)
> +                     dram_info->ranks = ranks;
> +             else if (ranks == 1)
> +                     dram_info->ranks = 1;
>       }
>  
> -     if (dram_info->rank == I915_DRAM_RANK_INVALID) {
> +     if (dram_info->ranks == 0) {
>               DRM_INFO("couldn't get memory rank information\n");
>               return -EINVAL;
>       }
> @@ -1328,7 +1321,7 @@ intel_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>       int ret;
>  
>       dram_info->valid = false;
> -     dram_info->rank = I915_DRAM_RANK_INVALID;
> +     dram_info->ranks = 0;
>       dram_info->bandwidth_kbps = 0;
>       dram_info->num_channels = 0;
>  
> @@ -1358,9 +1351,8 @@ intel_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>               sprintf(bandwidth_str, "unknown");
>       DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DRAM bandwidth:%s, total-channels: %u\n",
>                     bandwidth_str, dram_info->num_channels);
> -     DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DRAM rank: %s rank 16GB-dimm:%s\n",
> -                   (dram_info->rank == I915_DRAM_RANK_DUAL) ?
> -                   "dual" : "single", yesno(dram_info->is_16gb_dimm));
> +     DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DRAM ranks: %d, 16GB-dimm:%s\n",
> +                   dram_info->ranks, yesno(dram_info->is_16gb_dimm));
>  }
>  
>  /**
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index cc09caf3870e..c9cb13a6edaf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -1833,11 +1833,7 @@ struct drm_i915_private {
>               bool valid;
>               bool is_16gb_dimm;
>               u8 num_channels;
> -             enum dram_rank {
> -                     I915_DRAM_RANK_INVALID = 0,
> -                     I915_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE,
> -                     I915_DRAM_RANK_DUAL
> -             } rank;
> +             u8 ranks;
>               u32 bandwidth_kbps;
>               bool symmetric_memory;
>       } dram_info;
> @@ -2071,10 +2067,9 @@ struct drm_i915_private {
>  
>  struct dram_channel_info {
>       struct info {
> -             u8 size, width;
> -             enum dram_rank rank;
> +             u8 size, width, ranks;
>       } l_info, s_info;
> -     enum dram_rank rank;
> +     u8 ranks;
>       bool is_16gb_dimm;
>  };

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to