Hi Daniel, On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:43:52 +0100 Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch> wrote: > > The patches in my next queue are fully reviewed and (should) have seen > at least basic testing. The additional QA on top is just normal > regression testing and about every 2 weeks a manual testing cycle for > things like hotplug on the bazillion configurations we support (since > that takes our QA team about 1 week to complete we can't do higher > frequency there). The reason we've put that next queue buffer into > place was that before the pulls to Dave received essentially 0 testing > from our QA, resulting in lots more regressions slipping through. > -next-queued is also what I run here on all my machines and what patch > development is usually based on for drm/i915. > > Does that put your concerns at ease?
Some what, thanks. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
pgpU73bBxPhHH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
